Forensic Update

Reflections on information management within the legal and regulatory arena

Posts Tagged ‘ediscovery maturity model’

General Counsel Toolworks Forum: Data Governance & eDiscovery

Posted by Johnny Lee on December 1, 2011

Sponsored by Grant Thornton LLP’s Forensic & Litigation professionals, the Forum offers educational events and resources for today’s in-house counsel and corporate senior management. We collaborate with trial and transaction lawyers from some the nation’s leading law firms to bring you periodic complimentary webcasts addressing important financial, operational and legal issues that can impact your organization.

Each event will be supported by a customized Toolbox — documents and other resources offering guidance on the topics covered by the webcast.  The next Toolworks Forum will focus upon the state of the e-discovery marketplace; the importance of intelligent, proactive information and litigation management; and practical steps companies can take to reduce expenses and risks associated with civil litigation and government investigations.

This webinar event will be held on Thursday, January 19, 2012, and it will begin at 1:00pm Eastern time and continue for 90 minutes.  CLE credit has been applied for, and full details can be found here.  Johnny Lee, Director in Grant Thornton’s Forensic & Litigation practice, and Dante Stella, eDiscovery practice leader at Dykema Gossett, will present.


Posted in Computer Forensics, Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Information Security, Investigations, Litigation Hold, Records Retention, Social Networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

“Controlling your Data Avalanche” Webinar…

Posted by Johnny Lee on October 27, 2011


I am pleased to announce that I will join luminaries from Vedder Price, a prominent U.S. law firm, in a discussion on “Managing your Data Avalanche” on November 16, 2011.  This webinar will delve into strategies for satisfying an organization’s legal obligations associated with Records Retention, eDiscovery, Litigation Holds, and Data Privacy.

“All too often, companies approach their data management obligations reactively and in a piecemeal fashion. This need not be the case; in fact, companies can satisfy their legal obligations with greater certainty — and more economically — through comprehensive data management strategies.”

This Webinar will be of interest to General Counsel, Chief Compliance and Information Officers, and those with a key role in managing eDiscovery or litigation within an organization.  This Webinar will provide an overview of legal trends in data management, with a specific focus on social media, cloud computing, eDiscovery, litigation holds, and data breach preparedness and response.  We will discuss ways in which companies can better manage their data through proactive data-management strategies.

To register for this webinar, please click here.  (Login information and presentation materials will be sent to registrants prior to the webinar.)

Click to learn more about Grant Thornton’s Forensics, Investigations and Litigation practice.   Click to learn more about Vedder Price’s Records Management, eDiscovery and Data Privacy practice.

Posted in Announcement, Computer Forensics, Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Forensic Accounting, Information Security, Investigations, Litigation Hold, Privacy, Records Retention, Social Networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Excellent Session with the IT GRC experts at annual ISACA Conference…

Posted by Johnny Lee on October 26, 2011

ISACA_ITGRC-LogoLast week, I had the pleasure of presenting to a lively audience at the world’s leading conference for IT governance, risk and compliance professionals. The event, hosted at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Orlando by the good folks at ISACA, brought together a panoply of experts in the auditing, compliance, privacy, and information security space.

I presented on the subject of Data Governance and Electronic Discovery, and how these concepts represent “flip sides of the same coin.” What was particularly rewarding for me was the level of interest and participation during our interactive case study. Thanks to all who attended and participated last week…I enjoyed myself immensely, and I hope that you found it a rewarding discussion.

Posted in Computer Forensics, Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Fraud, Information Security, Investigations, Litigation Hold, Privacy, Records Retention, Social Networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Panel discussion: “Data Governance & Electronic Discovery – Flip Sides of the Same Coin”

Posted by Johnny Lee on September 22, 2011

SIM AtlantaForensicUpdate editor, Johnny Lee, is moderating a panel entitled “Data Governance and Electronic Discovery – Flip Sides of the Same Coin.”  The luncheon event, hosted by the Atlanta chapter of the Society for Information Management will be held tomorrow, September 23rd at The Georgian Club.

Joining me on the dais will Ed Shubert, 25-year veteran of the F.B.I. and current Director of Corporation Security at McKesson; Marty Smith, former Chief Information Officer at ChoicePoint; and Michael de Janes, former General Counsel and Chief Data Officer at ChoicePoint.  I’m excited about diving into some complex issues with these gentlemen, and I hope to see some familiar faces in the crowd.  Details on the event can be found here.

Posted in Announcement, Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Information Security, Investigations, Litigation Hold, Privacy, Records Retention, Social Networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Forensic Update editor presenting at North American ISACA conference…

Posted by Johnny Lee on May 17, 2011

The world’s leading conference for IT audit, control, security and governance professionals holds its 2011 annual conference in Las Vegas. ForensicUpdate editor, Johnny Lee, will present on the topic of “Data Governance and eDiscovery: Good Faith, Bad Actors, and Questionable Data.”  Click here for more details.

Posted in Announcement, Computer Forensics, Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Information Security, Investigations, Litigation Hold, Privacy, Records Retention, Social Networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Enterprise E-mail Management…Why it Matters So Much

Posted by Johnny Lee on February 21, 2011

Email Archive

Let’s face it, the thought of enterprise email management simply is not topping the list of sexy, self-evident corporate priorities these days.  Of course, there’s nothing like the negative treatment of genuinely embarrassing news coverage or court sanctions (or worse) to get organizations to revisit the necessity of this vital portion of data governance.

Simply put, it’s hard to fund (much less carry to fruition) an enterprise program that focuses on data management.  While litigation and prosecutions may make headlines, email management is not merely about avoiding culpability and other pitfalls in those arenas.  Properly done, enterprise email management can reduce IT spend, make business processes more efficient, and save hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of dollars annually for companies facing any sort of regulatory scrutiny or civil litigation.

Indeed, companies in every industry and geography are seeing an increase in the rate of litigation and regulatory scrutiny.  This increase is changing not just the way organizations handle such matters but the way in which they do business generally.

According to the latest installment of the annual Corporate Litigation Trends from international law firm Fulbright & Jaworski, many organizations are anticipating not only an increase in litigation and regulatory activity, but half believe that the “legal industry” will permanently change the way their business is conducted.  The survey also highlights the belief that legal and regulatory changes related to corruption and bribery investigations, data privacy, and social media will force organizations to think more proactively about their data governance initiatives.

Of course, there is no shortage of literature detailing why data governance is a good idea.  Despite this, few organizations get this right.  The profound disconnect between stakeholders within IT, Legal, HR, and Finance seems to be the principal explanation for why more organizations are not successful in these programs.  Historically, most companies launch an earnest (though myopic and frequently doomed) effort from the IT group.  When this effort failed for lack of consensus or effectiveness, organizations would effectively shelve effort for another year, chalking it up to insurmountable obstacles.  For a long time, this “charmed life” syndrome was permitted because companies so rarely faced a bet-the-company proposition that hinged on something as mundane as records management.  Today’s legal and regulatory arena makes this attitude a substantial gamble, and fewer executives, boards of directors, and audit committees are willing to tolerate it any longer.

More and more organizations are taking a proactive stance, and they seem to start with what is typically the most substantial data repository: electronic mail.  This is probably a wise gambit, though it should be tackled circumspectly.  While true that corporate users exchanged over 60 billion e-mails daily in 2009, it is sheer folly to consider this issue as strictly a technological headache.

The failure to integrate policy, training, monitoring, and PROCESS is the chief reason cited by courts and regulators for sanctions—not the breakdown of a given technology.  Accordingly, if you are in an organization that is finally seeing the light and embracing data governance, learn from the missteps of your colleagues: treat the enterprise initiative of data governance like…well, an enterprise initiative.  Lead with the notion of a “program” (not a project) and manage change from the top down (i.e., establish policy stances that extend to everyone; design process that aligns with policy; then select technology that aligns with these processes).  Finally, don’t forget about training, custodian acknowledgements, and monitoring controls.

Posted in Data Governance, ECM, eDiscovery, Litigation Hold, Privacy, Records Retention | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

%d bloggers like this: